The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities

Authors: Irwin, R. E.ORCID; Brody, A. K.; Waser, N. M.ORCID

Year: 2001

Journal: Oecologia, Vol. 129, pp. 161-168

Publisher: UNKNOWN

DOI: 10.1007/s004420100739

Keywords: COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, FLORAL LARCENY, POLLINATION BIOLOGY, POPULATION ECOLOGY, RMBL

Abstract

A meta-analysis on existing studies shows that larceny has an overall detrimental effect on female reproductive success of plants, and that effect size depends on the types of robbers, thieves, and pollinators that interact as well as on the reproductive biology of the plant.

Download PDF View at Publisher

Local Knowledge Graph (18 entities)

Loading graph...

Related Works

Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.

The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities

Abstract

Local Knowledge Graph (18 entities)

Related Works

Nectar Robbing in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness

The terminology of floral larceny

Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?

Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness

Data from: Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants

Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics And Biodiversity: Proceedings

Ecosystem Disturbance and Wildlife Conservation in Western Grasslands

Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting

Cited By (230 times, 20 in Knowledge Hub)

The hole truth: why do bumble bees rob flowers more than once?

Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes

Why are some plant-nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness

Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness components of the host plant <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>

Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>

Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web

Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>

Mechanisms of tolerance to floral larceny in two animal-pollinated wildflowers, <i>Polemonium viscosum</i> and <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>

Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system

The consequences of direct versus indirect spsecies interactions on selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata

Floral larceny: Implications, resistance, and the potential for tolerance

Interactions among nectar robbing, floral herbivory, and ant protection in <i>Linaria vulgaris</i>

Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris

Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study

Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: does high nectar production confer tolerance?

The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense

The structure of plant-pollinator interactions in montane meadow environments

Impact of nectar robbing on estimates of pollen flow: conceptual predictions and emperical outcomes

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

References (63)

Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant

Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?

Nectar Robbing in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness

What plant ecologists can learn from zoology

Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata

The terminology of floral larceny

Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species