Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant
Abstract
The effects of nectar robbers on plants and their mutualistic pollinators are poorly understood due, in part, to the paucity of studies examining male reproductive success in nectar-robbed plants. Here we measured the effects of a nectar-robbing bumblebee, Bombus occidentalis, on realized male reproductive success (seeds sired) in a hummingbird-pollinated plant, Ipomopsis aggregata. To determine the effects of nectar robbing on paternity, we used a series of experimental populations of plants containing a known allozyme marker. In each population, we experimentally controlled the levels of nectar robbing on each I. aggregata plant by cutting a hole in the corolla with dissecting scissors and removing nectar with a micro-capillary tube. We measured hummingbird-pollinator foraging behavior and fruit and seed production (maternal function) for each plant. We then genotyped seeds for the allozyme marker to determine the number of seeds sired by plants with known levels of robbing. Heavy nectar robbing (> 80% of flowers robbed) significantly reduced the number of seeds sired, as well as the number of seeds produced due to pollinator avoidance of heavily robbed plants. Total plant reproduction, both male and female contributions, were reduced by 50% due to high levels of robbing. To date, no other studies have measured the effects of nectar robbing on realized male function (number of seeds sired). Ours is the first study to demonstrate that robbing can simultaneously decrease realized male reproductive success as well as female reproductive success, and that the effects are incurred indirectly through pollinator avoidance of robbed plants.
Local Knowledge Graph (18 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Nectar Robbing in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness
Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: does high nectar production confer tolerance?
Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness
Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Data from: Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants
Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?
The Belittled Beaver
Proceedings: Using Seeds of Native Species on Rangelands
A New Hydrologic Perspective of How Beaver Ponds Function
Cited By (73 times, 13 in Knowledge Hub)
Conditional Exploitation and Context-Dependent Fitness Consequences of Pollination Mutualisms
Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness components of the host plant <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions
Effects of nectar robbing on pollen deposition and hummingbird-pollinator behavior in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Mechanisms of tolerance to floral larceny in two animal-pollinated wildflowers, <i>Polemonium viscosum</i> and <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Nectar robbing patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata and Linaria vulgaris
Floral larceny: Implications, resistance, and the potential for tolerance
Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: does high nectar production confer tolerance?
Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species
The effects of ungulate herbivory and nutrient variation on pollen reciept in Ipomopsis aggregata
The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities
References (44)
7 in Knowledge Hub, 37 external
