The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense
Abstract
Plants are under siege from a diversity of enemies that consume both leaf and floral parts. Plants resist damage to leaves in a variety of ways, and we now have a rich literature documenting how plants defend themselves against herbivore attack. In contrast, the mechanisms by which plants resist enemies that consume floral parts or resources are much less known, even though damage to floral tissue usually has tighter links to plant fitness than damage to leaf tissue. Many plants experience nectar robbing, whereby floral visitors remove nectar from flowers, often without pollinating. Nectar robbers can reduce plant fitness to degrees comparable to, or even surpassing, reduction by herbivores. However, because nectar attracts both pollinators and nectar robbers, plants face a dilemma in defending against nectar robbers without also deterring pollinators. Here, we extend the conceptual framework of resistance to herbivores to include resistance to nectar robbers, focusing on nectar traits. We review published data and find that an array of nectar traits may deter robbers without deterring pollinators. Although resistance traits against robbers have been broadly identified, the costs and benefits of these traits in terms of plant fitness remain poorly understood. We present data showing that a nectar trait (dilute nectar) might directly, as well as indirectly, benefit plant fitness by deterring nectar-robbing bumble bees of Ipomopsis aggregata without deterring hummingbird pollinators. However, the magnitude of any plant fitness benefit will depend on the degree to which plants are pollen- vs. resource-limited in a given year. The results of our work offer both conceptual and empirical insight into how plants cope with attack by nonpollinating floral visitors through a relatively unexplored trait, nectar.
Local Knowledge Graph (23 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities
Nectar Robbing in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness
Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness
Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Data from: Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants
Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?
Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics And Biodiversity: Proceedings
Colorado's Natural Heritage: Rare and Imperiled Animals, Plants, and Plant Communities
Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting
Cited By (209 times, 18 in Knowledge Hub)
Sweet and salty: Pollinators and sodium-enriched nectar
Trade-off mitigation: a conceptual framework for understanding floral adaptation in multispecies interactions
Effects of nectar robbing on the volatile organic compounds and nectar chemistry of intraindividual flowers in <i> Corydalis caseana </i> ssp. <i> brandegeei </i>
Pollen and vegetative secondary chemistry of three pollen-rewarding lupines
Consequences of Nectar Robbing in Colorado Wildflowers: Insect Variation and Nectar Sugar Concentration
Pollen thieving and pollen limitation in gynodioecious <i>Polemonium foliosissimum</i> (Polemoniaceae)
Norditerpene alkaloid concentrations in tissues and floral rewards of larkspurs and impacts on pollinators
Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness components of the host plant <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
The effects of floral fragrance manipulations of <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i> on the seed predator <i>Hylemya</i>
The effects of nutrient addition on floral characters and pollination in two subalpine plants, <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i> and <i>Linum lewisii</i>
Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
The effects of mine disturbance and contamination on pollination of subalpine wildflowers
Mechanisms of tolerance to floral larceny in two animal-pollinated wildflowers, <i>Polemonium viscosum</i> and <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i>
Bottom-up effects of nutrient enrichment on plants, pollinators, and their interactions
Pollination subsidies between wetland and dry meadow habitats
The consequences of direct versus indirect spsecies interactions on selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata
Floral larceny: Implications, resistance, and the potential for tolerance
Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: does high nectar production confer tolerance?
References (59)
6 in Knowledge Hub, 53 external
