← Back to PublicationsJournal Article

The hole truth: why do bumble bees rob flowers more than once?

Authors: Bronstein, J. L.; Davidowitz, G.; Litchenberg, E.; Irwin, R. E.ORCID
Year: 2024
Journal: Plants, Vol. 13, pp. 2507
DOI: 10.3390/plants13172507

Abstract

Primary nectar-robbers feed through holes they make in flowers, often bypassing the plant's reproductive organs in the process. In many robbed plants, multiple holes are made in a single flower. Why a flower should be robbed repeatedly is difficult to understand: a hole signals that a nectar forager has already fed, which would seem likely to predict low rewards. We tested three explanations for this pattern in <i>Corydalis caseana</i> (Fumariaceae), a bumble bee pollinated and robbed plant: (1) multiple holes appear only after all flowers have been robbed once; (2) individual foragers make multiple holes during single visits; and (3) it is more profitable for bees to rob older flowers, even if they have already been robbed. We tested these hypotheses from 2014 to 2016 in a Colorado, USA population using data on robbing rates over time, floral longevity, nectar accumulation in visited and unvisited flowers, and the accumulation of robbing holes across the life of flowers. Multiple holes were already appearing when two-thirds of flowers still lacked a single hole, allowing us to reject the first hypothesis. The second hypothesis cannot offer a full explanation for multiple robbing holes because 35% of additional holes appeared in flowers one or more days after the first hole was made. Repeated sampling of bagged and exposed inflorescences revealed that flowers filled at a constant rate and refilled completely after being drained. Consequently, young flowers are of consistently low value to foragers compared to older flowers even if they had previously been robbed, consistent with the third hypothesis. While further studies are needed, these results offer a simple explanation for the paradoxical clustering of nectar-robbing damage in this and possibly other plant species.

Local Knowledge Graph (17 entities)

Loading graph...

Cited 2 times

References (46)

16 in Knowledge Hub, 30 external

Publication

Bumble bees are constant to nectar-robbing behaviour despite low switching costs

2020Anim. Behav.DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.008
Publication

Competition for nectar resources does not affect bee foraging tactic constancy

2020Ecol. Entomol.DOI: 10.1111/een.12866
Publication

Why are some plant-nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

2018OikosDOI: 10.1111/oik.05440
Publication

Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms

2018EcologyDOI: 10.1002/ecy.2395
Publication

Consequences of secondary nectar robbing for male components of plant reproduction

2018Am. J. Bot.DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1082
Publication

Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants

2017J. Ecol.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12657
Publication

Foraging strategy predicts foraging economy in a facultative secondary nectar robber

2017OikosDOI: 10.1111/oik.04229
Publication

The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?

2017Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013
Publication

Stimulation of flower nectar replenishment by removal: a survey of eleven animal-pollinated plant species

2014J. Pollinat. Ecol.DOI: 10.26786/1920-7603(2014)2
Publication

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

2002OecologiaDOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z
Publication

The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities

2001OecologiaDOI: 10.1007/s004420100739
Publication

The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior

2001Am. J. Bot.DOI: 10.2307/3558423
Publication

Reproductive biology of a North American subalpine plant: <i>Corydalis caseana</i> A. Gray ssp. <i>brandegei</i> (S. Watson) G. B. Ownbey

2000Plant Species Biol.DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2000.00047.x
Publication

Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?

2000EcologyDOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2651:ANRCOM]2.0.CO;2
Publication

The terminology of floral larceny

1980EcologyDOI: 10.2307/1936841
Publication

The sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing

DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.698137