The sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing
Abstract
Animals foraging from flowers must assess their environment and make critical decisions about which patches, plants, and flowers to exploit to obtain limiting resources. The cognitive ecology of plant-pollinator interactions explores not only the complex nature of pollinator foraging behavior and decision making, but also how cognition shapes pollination and plant fitness. Floral visitors sometimes depart from what we think of as typical pollinator behavior and instead exploit floral resources by robbing nectar (bypassing the floral opening and instead consuming nectar through holes or perforations made in floral tissue). The impacts of nectar robbing on plant fitness are well-studied; however, there is considerably less understanding, from the animal’s perspective, about the cognitive processes underlying nectar robbing. Examining nectar robbing from the standpoint of animal cognition is important for understanding the evolution of this behavior and its ecological and evolutionary consequences. In this review, we draw on central concepts of foraging ecology and animal cognition to consider nectar robbing behavior either when individuals use robbing as their only foraging strategy or when they switch between robbing and legitimate foraging. We discuss sensory and cognitive biases, learning, and the role of a variable environment in making decisions about robbing vs. foraging legitimately. We also discuss ways in which an understanding of the cognitive processes involved in nectar robbing can address questions about how plant-robber interactions affect patterns of natural selection and floral evolution. We conclude by highlighting future research directions on the sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing.
Local Knowledge Graph (17 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?
Competition for nectar resources does not affect bee foraging tactic constancy
Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?
Data from: Foraging strategy predicts foraging economy in a facultative secondary nectar robber
Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?
Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness
Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics And Biodiversity: Proceedings
Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach to Ecosystem Exploitation and Rehabiltitation Decision
A New Hydrologic Perspective of How Beaver Ponds Function
Cited By (15 times, 3 in Knowledge Hub)
The hole truth: why do bumble bees rob flowers more than once?
Investigating the potential mechanism behind bumble bee preference for Corydalis flowers inhabited by nectar specialist yeast
Elucidating the influence of a nectar yeast and nectar robbing on bumblebee foraging tactic constancy
References (84)
13 in Knowledge Hub, 71 external
