← Back to PublicationsJournal Article

The sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing

Authors: Richman, S. K.; Barker, J. L.; Baek, M.; Papaj, D. R.; Irwin, R. E.ORCID; Bronstein, J. L.
Year: 2021
Journal: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 9, pp. 698137
Publisher: UNKNOWN
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.698137

Abstract

Animals foraging from flowers must assess their environment and make critical decisions about which patches, plants, and flowers to exploit to obtain limiting resources. The cognitive ecology of plant-pollinator interactions explores not only the complex nature of pollinator foraging behavior and decision making, but also how cognition shapes pollination and plant fitness. Floral visitors sometimes depart from what we think of as typical pollinator behavior and instead exploit floral resources by robbing nectar (bypassing the floral opening and instead consuming nectar through holes or perforations made in floral tissue). The impacts of nectar robbing on plant fitness are well-studied; however, there is considerably less understanding, from the animal’s perspective, about the cognitive processes underlying nectar robbing. Examining nectar robbing from the standpoint of animal cognition is important for understanding the evolution of this behavior and its ecological and evolutionary consequences. In this review, we draw on central concepts of foraging ecology and animal cognition to consider nectar robbing behavior either when individuals use robbing as their only foraging strategy or when they switch between robbing and legitimate foraging. We discuss sensory and cognitive biases, learning, and the role of a variable environment in making decisions about robbing vs. foraging legitimately. We also discuss ways in which an understanding of the cognitive processes involved in nectar robbing can address questions about how plant-robber interactions affect patterns of natural selection and floral evolution. We conclude by highlighting future research directions on the sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing.

Local Knowledge Graph (17 entities)

Loading graph...

References (84)

13 in Knowledge Hub, 71 external

Publication

Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms

2018EcologyDOI: 10.1002/ecy.2395
Publication

The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?

2017Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013
Publication

Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris

2005OikosDOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13884.x
Publication

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

2002OecologiaDOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z
Publication

The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior

2001Am. J. Bot.DOI: 10.2307/3558423
Publication

Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists?

2000EcologyDOI: 10.1890/0012-96582000081[2651:ANRCOM]2.0.CO;2
Publication

Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution

1999NaturwissenschaftenDOI: 10.1007/s001140050636
Publication

Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egg-laying butterflies

1984Anim. Behav.DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80321-8
Publication

Nectar production patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae)

1983Am. J. Bot.DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1983.tb10850.x
Publication

The terminology of floral larceny

1980EcologyDOI: 10.2307/1936841
Publication

Competition for nectar resources does not affect bee foraging tactic constancy

Ecol. Entomol.DOI: 10.1111/een.12866
Publication

Foraging strategy predicts foraging economy in a facultative secondary nectar robber

OikosDOI: 10.1111/oik.04229
Publication

Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants

J. Ecol.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12657