Pollen presentation and pollination syndromes, with special reference to <i>Penstemon</i>
Abstract
Abstract Pollen presentation theory (PPT) allows for a re‐examination of some classic themes in pollination biology. Here, we outline its implications in the context of bee‐ and bird‐adapted species of Penstemon and Keckiella (Scrophulariaceae). PPT models the optimal schedule of pollen presentation, based on the frequency of visits by pollinators, and the capacities of those pollinators to remove and deposit pollen. High visitation rates, high removal and low deposition all favor plants that present pollen in many small doses. Dosing is achieved through gradual opening of anthers and through anthers opening only narrowly. We hypothesize that bees have higher rates of removal and lower rates of deposition than birds; therefore, bee‐pollinated species should have anthers that open more gradually and less completely than bird‐pollinated species. Before presenting preliminary results that affirm this prediction, we critically discuss the characterization of species by pollination syndrome. PPT sheds new light on why plants may specialize on particular pollinators. Stebbins’ most effective pollinator can be recast as the pollinator that deposits more of the pollen that it removes, thereby making other visitors into conditional parasites. Pollinator shifts might occur when a pollinator with low removal and high deposition becomes abundant; the plants would then be selected to discourage their previous pollinators who are now parasites. Bird‐pollination may favor anthers that open quickly and widely, thereby making bees wasteful parasites. Bee‐pollination may favor anthers that open slowly and narrowly, thereby making birds ineffective pollinators. In paired comparisons of closely related species, the hummingbird‐visited species were redder, had narrower or longer floral tubes, more exserted anthers and stigmas, less pronounced landing platforms, more inclined orientation, produced more nectar of a lower concentration, and had anthers that dehisce faster and more extensively.
Local Knowledge Graph (12 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen
Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants.
Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters
Data from: Influence of plant reproductive systems on the evolution of hummingbird pollination
Pollinator visitation rate and effectiveness vary with flowering phenology
Data from: Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant – pollinator community: the importance of sugar content and tongue length
Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics And Biodiversity: Proceedings
Vascular Plant Species of the Pawnee National Grassland
Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting
Cited By (168 times, 11 in Knowledge Hub)
Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding <i> Lupinus argenteus</i>
Trade-off mitigation: a conceptual framework for understanding floral adaptation in multispecies interactions
Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes
Variability in the effectiveness of <i>Penstemon strictus</i> pollinators and the role that water availability plays
A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis
Reciprocal benefits in a plant-pollinator mutualism
'Anti-bee' and 'pro-bird' changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers
Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and divergence of pollination modes in <i>Penstemon</i>
A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons
Dynamic nectar replenishment in flowers of <i>Penstemon</i> (Scrophulariaceae)
Pollen presentation and pollination syndromes, with special reference to <i>Penstemon</i>
References (98)
10 in Knowledge Hub, 88 external