Social security: are socially connected individuals less vigilant?
Abstract
Group size effects, whereby animals allocate less time to antipredator vigilance as a function of increasing group sizes are widely reported in many taxa, but group size is but one of many social attributes that could increase a individual’s sense of security. Indeed, meta-analyses suggest that group size only explains about 20% of the variation in vigilance, and studies have shown that social factors, such as dominance status, also influences perceived risk and time allocated to vigilance. Social network statistics quantify a variety of specific social attributes, some of which have been suggested to influence security. Using vigilance as an indicator of risk assessment, we tested the prediction that more socially connected female yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) allocate less time to vigilance while foraging compared to less socially connected individuals. We used a principle component analysis to reduce social attributes to three factors. After explaining variation accounted for by glucocorticoid levels, substrate, incline, and day of the year and, individuals in larger social groups allocated less time to vigilance while those in more cohesive social relationships allocated more time to vigilance. These somewhat contradictory results suggest that vigilance is multi-faceted and highlight the importance of using an attribute-based approach to explaining variation in vigilance. The attribute-based approach has allowed us, for the first time to show that social group size indeed reduces risk, and suggest that maintaining social relationships requires social vigilance. 2
Local Knowledge Graph (20 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Social security: Are socially connected individuals less vigilant?
Social Security: Do Individuals in Tight-Knit Social Groups Perceive Greater Security?
Social Security: social relationship strength and connectedness influence how marmots respond to alarm calls
Data from: A cost of being amicable in a hibernating marmot
Marmot mass gain rates relate to their group’s social structure
Data from: Strong social relationships are associated with decreased longevity in a facultatively social mammal
Management of Livestock Herbivory in Relationship to Sage-grouse Habitats and Populations
A Fence Design for Excluding Elk Without Impeding Other Wildlife
An Ecological Basis for Beaver Management in the Rocky Mountain Region
Cited By (27 times, 15 in Knowledge Hub)
Does rainfall or temperature influence antipredator vigilance in a hibernating mammal?
Social security: individuals in socially reciprocal groups may perceive security from predators
Costly calling: Marmots who alarm call at higher rates are less likely to survive the summer and live shorter lives
Social security: Does social position influence flight initiation distance?
Does current weather or seasonality influence antipredator vigilance in a hibernating mammal?
Social Security: Do Individuals in Tight-Knit Social Groups Perceive Greater Security?
Agonistic and affiliative social relationships are associated with marmot docility but not boldness
Social security: Does social position influence flight initiation distance?
Are vigilance and flight initiation distance correlated in yellow-bellied marmots?
Relationships matter: How the social environment affects individual fitness-related behaviors
More social female yellow-bellied marmots, <i>Marmota flaviventer</i>, have enhanced summer survival
Adaptive gene regulation in wild mammals exposed to high predator abundance
Social security: less socially connected marmots produce noisier alarm calls
Correlates of maternal glucocorticoid levels in a socially flexible rodent
More social female yellow-bellied marmots have enhanced summer survival
References (57)
24 in Knowledge Hub, 33 external