← Back to PublicationsJournal Article

Bumblebee response to variation in nectar availability

Authors: Pleasants, J.
Year: 1981
Journal: Ecology, Vol. 62, pp. 1648-1661
Publisher: UNKNOWN
DOI: 10.2307/1941519
Keywords: ANIMAL BEHAVIOR, ENTOMOLOGY, PLANT-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS, POLLINATION BIOLOGY, RMBL

Abstract

I examined the response of bumblebees to two kinds of spatial variation and two kinds of temporal variation in nectar levels. The spatial variation involved differences in reward value among plant species and differences in nectar availability among patches of flowers of a single species. The temporal variation involved changes in nectar availability over a season and between years. In all cases the response of bees was measured by differences in bee density or abundance. The response of bees of different plant species was determined by the density of foraging bees on the flowers of each species at a given time (bee:flower ratio = B/F). I examined several groups of plant species whose members overlapped in their flowering periods and in their bumblebee visitors. Within a group, the relative magnitudes of the B/F's for species indicate the degree to which their flowers are preferred by bees. If bees are optimal foragers, preference should reflect the per—flower reward value of species. I characterized the potential reward value of species by their nectar production rates (NPR's). The bees' preference for species was found to be very similar to the relative magnitudes of their NPR's. I also considered whether including the time and energy costs of foraging on the different species would produce a better predictor of preference. While these factors did affect the absolute reward value of species they did not influence their reward value relative to one another. Foraging costs are most likely to have no effect on preference when species have similar floral morphologies. To assess the response of bees to differences in patch quality I bagged some of the inflorescenes in an experimental patch. Following this reduction in the number of flowers, the number of bees in the patch decreased proportionately, producing a B/F very similar to that of a control patch. When the bagging was removed the number of bees increased such that the B/F was again similar to that of the control patch. In general these results provide further support for optimal foraging in bumblebees. I examined the response of bees to temporal variation in nectar levels to determine whether resource limitation for bumblebees change over time. Seasonal changes in the abundances of three bumblebee species were compared with seasonal changes in the total nectar production by the plants each bee visited. Preference factors were used to convert floral production to nectar production. In general, seasonal production and utilization were closely matched, indicating no major change in nectar limitation. The cumulative numbers of bees seen during each of two summer seasons (1974 and 1975) were very similar. This indicates that the resource base, which had not changed between years, was capable of supporting only a limited number of bees. During 1975 a natural species removal experiment occurred which allowed an assessment of competition among bees. Apis mellifera, which had been well represented in 1974, was absent. The bumblebees of short and medium tongue length with which honeybees overlapped in resource used exhibited competitive release. Their abundances increased in 1975 resulting in near—perfect density compensation.

Local Knowledge Graph (5 entities)

Loading graph...

Cited By (178 times, 23 in Knowledge Hub)

Article

The shifting importance of abiotic and biotic factors across the life cycles of wild pollinators

2022DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.25.489447
Article

Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding <i> Lupinus argenteus</i>

2021DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1613
Student Paper

The effect of early snowmelt on pollination: A study of four Rocky Mountain subalpine plant species

2021
Article

Temporal flexibility in the structure of plant–pollinator interaction networks

2020DOI: 10.1111/oik.07526
Article

Bumble bees are constant to nectar-robbing behaviour despite low switching costs

2020DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.008
Article

Competition for nectar resources does not affect bee foraging tactic constancy

2020DOI: 10.1111/een.12866
Article

Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant-pollinator communitiy: the importance of sugar content and tongue length

2019DOI: 10.1111/ele.13204
Thesis

Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes

2019
Article

Why are some plant-nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

2018DOI: 10.1111/oik.05440
Thesis

Conditional Exploitation and Context-Dependent Fitness Consequences of Pollination Mutualisms

2018
Article

Shifts in water availability mediate plant–pollinator interactions

2017DOI: 10.1111/nph.14602
Thesis

Plant-Pollinator Interactions and Environmental Change: Effects of Experimental Changes in Phenology and Water Availability on a Montane Wildflower

2017
Article

Drought, pollen and nectar availability, and pollination success

2016DOI: 10.1890/15-1423.1
Article

Beyond biomass: measuring the effects of community-level nitrogen enrichment on floral traits, pollinator visitation and plant reproduction

2010DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01648.x
Article

The effects of nutrient addition on floral characters and pollination in two subalpine plants, <i>Ipomopsis aggregata</i> and <i>Linum lewisii</i>

2009
Thesis

Bottom-up effects of nutrient enrichment on plants, pollinators, and their interactions

2008
Thesis

Reciprocal benefits in a plant-pollinator mutualism

2008
Student Paper

Pollination subsidies between wetland and dry meadow habitats

2007
Article

Floral mimicry by a plant pathogen

1993DOI: 10.1038/362056a0
Article

Nectar production patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae)

1983DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1983.tb10850.x
Article

Flowering plant density and pollinator visitation in Senecio

1983DOI: 10.1007/bf00379326
Article

The distribution of standing crop of nectar: what does it really tell us?

1983DOI: 10.1007/bf00377188
Article

Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii

1983DOI: 10.1038/302422a0