Floral color change in <i>Lupinus Argenteus</i> (Fabaceae): Why should plants advertise the location of unrewarding flowers to pollinators?
Abstract
I examined the adaptive significance of two floral traits in the perennial herb, Lupinus argenteus: 1) the retention of corollas on "spent" flowers, i.e., flowers containing inviable pollen, unreceptive stigmas, and negligible pollinator rewards and 2) a change in corolla color of retained "spent" flowers, which is restricted to a spot on the banner petal. At anthesis, this spot is yellow, and approximately four days later, it changes to purple. After the change, purple flowers remain on plants an additional 5-7 days before corolla abscission occurs; purple flowers were avoided by pollinators, presumably because they contained less pollen (rewards) than yellow ones. I experimentally tested the hypothesis that purple flowers contribute to the floral display of the plant by removing varying numbers of spent flowers and assessing the effect on pollination visitation. Pollinators preferentially approached and foraged on plants with greater numbers of flowers per inflorescence; they did not discriminate between yellow (rewarding) and purple (nonrewarding) flowers at interplant distances greater than 0.4 meters but would preferentially forage on plants with more total flowers, even if these individuals contained fewer rewarding flowers. Thus, spent flowers increased the overall attractiveness of plants to pollinators. In theory, color change may benefit plants in two ways. First, by directing pollinators to rewarding flowers, the change may increase pollinator foraging efficiency, with the result that pollinators visit more flowers before leaving plants (pollinator-tenure mechanism). Second, by directing pollinators to receptive flowers, the color change may prevent incoming pollen from being wasted on unreceptive stigmas and may prevent collection of inviable pollen (pollination-efficiency mechanism). I tested the pollinator-tenure mechanism experimentally by removing pollen from yellow flowers, thereby reducing the reliability of the color-reward signal. Pollinators visited fewer total flowers on experimental plants than on controls, resulting in reduced seed production in one year.
Local Knowledge Graph (6 entities)
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Foraging in bumblebees: rule of departure from an inflorescence
The Timing of Floral Color Change in Lupinus argenteus
Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding <i> Lupinus argenteus</i>
Data from: Attract or defend? Pollen and vegetative secondary chemistry of three pollen-rewarding lupines
Ecological causes and consequences of flower color polymorphism in a self-pollinating plant (Boechera stricta)
Pollinator visitation rate and effectiveness vary with flowering phenology
Colorado's Natural Heritage: Rare and Imperiled Animals, Plants, and Plant Communities
Native Plant Revegetation Guide for Colorado
Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting
Cited By (108 times, 8 in Knowledge Hub)
Consequences of pollen defense compounds for pollinators and antagonists in a pollen rewarding plant
The causes and consequences of pollen defence
Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding <i> Lupinus argenteus</i>
Pollen and vegetative secondary chemistry of three pollen-rewarding lupines
Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes
Do the differing pollen foraging strategies of <i>Megachile sp.</i> and <i>Bombus spp.</i> result in differing pollen removal and deposition rates in <i>Lupinus bakeri</i>?
Flowering phenology in subalpine meadows: does climate variation influence community co-flowering patterns?
Plant–Pollinator interactions in a changing climate
References (37)
1 in Knowledge Hub, 36 external