← Back to DocumentsDocument
Review of Data and Summary Opinions regarding Snowmass Creek Modification
Summary
Jay W. Skinner, ?2000,?Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife
Local Knowledge Graph (41 entities)
Loading graph...
Stakeholders (25)
Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.
United States Forest ServiceUnited States Bureau of Land ManagementUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceUnited States Geological SurveyColorado Department of WildlifeColorado Water Conservation BoardArmy Corps of EngineersDivision of Wildlife
Show 17 more
Division of Water ResourcesEnvironmental Defense FundMontana Department of Fish, Wildlife and ParksAspen Ski CompanyDon Chapman Consultants, Inc.Snowmass Water and Sanitation DistrictDivision 5 Water CourtSWSDEast Bay Municipal Utility DistrictChadwick and AssociatesConservation BoardState of Vermont Agency of Natural ResourcesASCEA EngineeringMiller & AssociatesNatural Resources AgencyEA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
Places (39)
Show 31 more
IdahoConvict CreekBrush CreekSaskatchewanHampshireGrand JunctionPitkinPitkin CountyVermontGreen RiverTemple ForkWestern Washington CascadeSnowmass Creek drainageSnowmass Creek watershedFlaming GorgeRoaring ForkNew BrunswickCastle CreekWest Snowmass CreekWest Snowmass CreekSnowmass LakeMaroon CreekCapitol CreekCredit RiverMiramichi RiverAmerican RiverSnowmass Ski AreaZiegler BridgeEast Walker RiverLogen River systemLogan River
Concepts & Topics (46)
snowpack persistencesnowpack persistencegroundwater storage dynamicsstreamflowstreamflowstreamflowwater table depthsconcentration-discharge relationships
Show 38 more
hydraulic gradienthabitat qualitydischargewater partitioningice microphysical processesice microphysical processesice microphysical processesblowing snowcurrent velocityR2water allocationaquatic entomologyminimum flow reductionvertical profileelectroshockingstatistical modelingBudyko formulationseasonal isolationspawningdiversionsminimum flowsmunicipal governmentR2CROSSIFIMInstream Flow Incremental MethodologyPhysical Habitat Simulation SystemPHABSIMR2CROSS studiesWUAgillnet samplingFebruary median flowFebruary median flowTwo-Thirds Median Flowincubation flowsMundie ruleVermont 2/3 median flowR2CROSS methodologywetted perimeter
Species (15)
External References Cited (2)
Works cited by this document, grouped by type.
other (2)
- Development of Instream Flow Recommendations In Colorado Using R2CROSS (1996) — Espegren, Gregory D
- Evaluation of Instream Flow Methods and Deterwination of Water Quantity Needs for Streams in the State of Colorado (1979) — Nehring, R. B
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Document
Review of Data and Summary of Opinions Regarding Snowmass Creek Modification
Document
The Value of Instream Flow Used to Produce a Recreational Fishery
Document
Water Rights 2001- Part 3
Article
Controls from above and below: Snow, soil, and steepness drive diverging trends of subsurface water and streamflow dynamics
Student Paper
Evaluation of mitigated wetlands, Gunnison, CO
Article
COLORADO RIVER BASIN UPDATE
Dataset
SnowEx20 Grand Mesa Autumn 2019 Snow Water Equivalent, Version 1
Dataset
SnowEx20 Grand Mesa Reference GIS Data Sets, Version 1
Dataset
