← Back to DocumentsDocument

Reclamation and Exploitation

Categories: Water, Geochemistry & Isotopes, Field Methods & Monitoring
Source: Sustainable Living Library

Summary

VER H EAR O F RECLAMATI ON law' s 16 0-acre limi tatio n o n E water d eliveri es to irrigators? H ave you been told tha t this is " pe tty p o liti cal tyra nny," inefficient a nd uneco nom ic? Tha t because o f it the h o usewife p ays m o r e for foo d in the m arke t? T hat it is an o utmoded myth fro m bygone tim es ? Tha t it should be elimi- nated, as the Public Land Law R eview Commi ssio n, under form er Cong ressm an W ayne Aspinall, recommended ? (Mo re r ecently, Sen- ator Lee M etcalf o f M o ntana called this bo dy th e "Natio nal Water ed- Dow n Commis sio n" because the N ixon Administration r epl aced membe rs frie ndly to " the 160." ) O r have you h eard tha t th e 160 is a true co nservatio n instrument, essential if p ro perly used, for achi eving a d ecen t environme nt, eve n for p r eserving a d ecent rural soci ety from self-des truc tio n ? Ever hear that in Imperial Valley, w here th e law goes un enfo rced, alm os t nine o ur o f ten fa rm workers (8 7.3 percent) belo ng ro th e econo mi c lower class, co mpared to, say, Iowa, just o utsid e the reclama tio n belt, w here th e pro p o rtio n is less th an o ne in seven (1 3.6 percent)? Eve r hear that th e Sierra Clu b, jo ined b y Frie nd s

Local Knowledge Graph (41 entities)

Loading graph...

Stakeholders (16)

Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.

United States Bureau of ReclamationUnited States Department of the InteriorCongressDepartment of InteriorThe Sierra ClubU.S. Supreme CourtDepartment of JusticeMetropolitan Water District
Show 8 more
Public Land Law Review CommissionNinth Circuit Court of AppealsNational Education AssociationState of CaliforniaHouse Irrigation CommitteeInterior CommitteesSan Francisco Federal District CourtNorth Coast Rivers Association