← Back to DocumentsDocument

Fiscal Impacts of Land Development: A Critique of Methods and Review of Issues

Date: 1975-01-01
Categories: Land Use
Source: Sustainable Living Library

Summary

Thomas Muller. 1975.

External References Cited (21)

Works cited by this document, grouped by type.

other (21)

  • and Dawson, Grace, Impact of Annex- ation on City Finances: A Case Study in Rich- mond, Virginia (1975)Regional Science Association, February
  • Scott, Claudia D., Forecasting Local Govern- ment Spending, Washington, D.C., The Urban Institute, 1972 (1974)Changes in expenditures for public services Bibliography in two cities, examining impact of growth pat- terns on these changes. “School Census in Fairfax Protested,” Washing- ton Post, August 5
  • 49, Bradford, P (1973)Economic Review, June
  • Collection of fourteen fiscal impact studies, in- cluding residential and nonresidential develop- ment (1973)Urban Growth—The California Experience
  • General Social and Economic Char- acteristics, United States Summary, Washington, D.C., June 1972 (1973)Washington, D.C., March
Show 16 more other
  • Sponsored by Na- tional Science Foundation (1973)Rand Corporation, May
  • Fiscal and other impact of growth in city (1973)Ann Arbor Growth Study, February
  • Com- puter-assisted procedure to examine revenue and cost data (1973)General computer simulation model with fiscal submodel. Sponsored by HUD. Gale, Dennis E., The Municipal Impact Evalua- tion System, American Society of Planning Of- ficials, Report No. 294, September
  • Fiscal impact of alternative development patterns for large tracts of land in semirural area (1973)The Greater Hartford Process, Options for Fu- ture Development of East Farms
  • Part of com- puter simulation system for Michigan State Hous- ing Development Authority (1972)Community Impact Model
  • General text on PUDs, including retrospective case study (1972)Rutgers University
  • Cri- tique of the Palo Alto Study (see 40 above), stating limitations of approach (1972)Home Builders of Greater Eastbay
  • Dis- cussion of factors which influence fiscal impact of residential and nonresidential development (1971)Outline of a general methodology, with fiscal data for Northern Virginia, for use by local governments. Stuart, Darwin G., and Teska, Robert B., “Who Pays for What?” Urban Land, March
  • Fiscal characteristics of county by type of land use, case study (1970)Use Analysis of Prince George’s County
  • Changes in public outlays as a result of rapid suburbani- zation New Jersey County and Local Government Study Commission, Multifamily Housing and Municipal Services, Trenton, 1973 (1969)State University of New York
  • Breese, Gerald, et al., The Impact of Large In- stallations on Nearby Areas—Accelerated Urban Growth, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1965 (1969)Kentucky Press
  • Review of earlier work on alternative development patterns (1967)Harvard University
  • Review of earlier work on the subject (1967)Harvard University
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1972 Census of Governments, Vol (1965)John Hopkins Press
  • Extensive bibliography of cost-benefit, cost- revenue analysis (1963)Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina
  • Cost differentials if location or pattern of residential development is varied (1955)Wheaton, William L., and Schussheim, Morton J., The Cost of Municipal Services in Residential Areas, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Commerce