← Back to DocumentsDocument
Environmental Valuation
Summary
Pete Klingsmith, Andrew Stirling, Paul Portney.
Local Knowledge Graph (41 entities)
Loading graph...
Stakeholders (21)
Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.
United States Environmental Protection AgencyUnited States Department of the InteriorUnited States Department of EnergyNational Park ServiceDepartment of InteriorUniversity of ColoradoNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationUSDOE
Show 13 more
International Atomic Energy AgencyNational Marine Fisheries ServiceEuropean CommissionState of AlaskaOECDOffice of General CounselGCESNYSERDAUK Health and Safety ExecutiveAttorney General of the State of AlaskaFraunhofer Institut für Systemtechnik und InnovationforschungEIA CentreNational Acid Precipitation Assessment Program
Places (35)
Show 27 more
TexasNorwayGlen CanyonOhioNew YorkTucsonWisconsinGreenwich, ConnecticutAmes, IowaTotawa, New JerseyBaltimore, MarylandLexington, KentuckyMontana RiversLos AngelesCambridgeAdirondacksSouthwestValdezGrand CanyonGrand Canyon National ParkHelsinkiManchesterMadridFederal Republic of GermanyFrankfurtUniversity of California, San DiegoLa Jolla, California
Concepts & Topics (45)
ecosystem functionwater quality standardsriparian zonenonpoint source pollution densitysoil erosionlegacy effectshabitat restorationcost
Show 37 more
energy developmentenergy developmentair quality monitoringair quality monitoringenergy flux residualstream restorationecological consequencescatchment water storageirrigationecological consequencescompensation paymentsecosystem-based managementIntrinsic Valueutility valuejudgment and decision-making frameworkWillingness to payacid rain acidificationacid rain acidificationrecoveryclinical severityclinical severityconservation statussimulation biasspill cleanupnatural resource inventorymarket-based pricingeconomic evaluationnon-use valuesreferendum scenariocontingent valuation methodcontingent valuation methodeconomic evaluationamenity misspecification biasGCESembedding phenomenonembedding phenomenonalternatives analysis
External References Cited (4)
Works cited by this document, grouped by type.
other (4)
- "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ1" American Economic Review (in press) (1991) — Hanemann, W. Michael
- Development and DesiKn of a Contingent Valuation Survey for Measuring the Public's Va]ue for Visibility Improvements at the Grand Canyon National Parle (1990)
- Preservation Values for VisibiUty Protection at the National Parks (1990) — Chestnut, L. G. and R. D. Rowe
- "Using Direct Questioning to Value the Existence Benefits of Preserved Natural Areas." AusttaJian Journal of Agricultural Economics 28 (August/December): 136-152 (1984) — Bennett, J. W
Related Works
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
Document
Environmental Valuation
Document
Upper Gunnison Basin In-Stream Flow Project
Document
The Role of Science in Colorado River Management
Thesis
Ecological and economic analysis of natural capital: assessing and modeling the substitutability of mitigation wetlands for natural sites
Article
The use of community- and ecosystem-level end points in environmental hazard assessment: a scientific and regulatory evaluation
Chapter
Towards a More Exact Ecology
Dataset
kcarrowsmith/communityBEF: Ecosphere2023
Dataset
Appendix 3 Metadata (CSV)
Dataset
